surfsteve wrote:Could somebody please explain to me why so much "proof" is needed to prove the official story of 9-11 a lie and so little was needed to go to war over it? If it is not a CIA disinfo front then Why does wikileaks refuse to publish anything exposing the 9-11 cover-up? If it's not a scam, its not fake opposition and there is nothing to hide why do all of the leaks need to be approved by the media that is co-publishing them?
surfsteve wrote:Facts? The only disproving fact anyone has stated is that Noam Chomsky said that 911 was too big a conspiracy to cover up. if that is true than how did they cover up the Manhattan Project which involved many times more people than would have been needed to pull off 911?
I played the videos http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nvx904dA ... playnext=1 and I seen the explosions and eye witness testimony with my own eyes illustrating the laws of physics, actual videos of the explosions and statements by groups of experts over a video of some guy saying it would be too hard to keep it a secret?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest