Barack Obama and George W. Bush have a lot in common. Not only were they
both elected as president of the United States, but despite rhetorical
differences, they share a lot of similarity in terms of policy as indicated
by actual events. Although Obama talked about change, he has
supplied an amazing amount of the same old stuff. His Race To The Top
proposal is only superficially different from No Child Left Behind. He has
for the most part stuck to Bush's strategies for dealing with the eonomy,
national security, and with the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. In short,
what we have is only a small amount of change, a lot of empty talk, and
basically the same old garbage recycled, but with a different look and
style.
Obama does present the pretense of pushing against the establishment and
corporate interests, but it seems that he has no intention of bringing about
real change. For instance, he has pushed watered down health care legislation that falls
well short of the kind of reform needed. Although he suggests that his
proposals constitute a first step toward the kind of health care system that
the American people deserve, there is no one who would seriously suggest
that the current proposals would really fix a horribly dysfunctional system, that
boasts great facilities, but incredibly poor access to them, should they
pass. Despite the contrived complaints of conservative media pundits, it's hard to make a
strong case the Obama is a liberal. Obviously he is stuck pretty squarely in
the middle-of-the-road and although you can call a duck anything you want,
it's pretty lame to pretend that it is something that it is not!
Clearly I am disappointed in Obama so far, but I do not actually regret
voting for him considering the viable choices presented on the ballot in
November 2008. What would make
me feel profound dissatisfaction with Obama would be if we were to enter
into an armed conflict with Iran. That would be such a thoroughly
disillusioning event that I would feel extreme contrition for ever uttering
a word of support for Obama. I fully realize that if the United States
attacks Iran it will be following a carefully orchestrated series of events
designed to make Iran appear to be the aggressor. For that reason I will accept
absolutely no excuse for armed aggression against Iran. Further, I hope that we do
not use Israel as an excuse should they decide to move militarily against
Iran! Although I sound rather negative here, I recognize that Obama has done
some good for this country and he has been somewhat of an improvement over
Bush, but this is a case where expectations have far exceeded actual
performance, at least so far.